Hidden H1

Request for Proposals for the 2027-2029 Schedule

The Western Nevada College galleries serve as a cultural and educational resource for students, faculty, staff, and the broader community. Through innovative exhibitions and programming, we promote equity, inclusion, and lifelong learning while enriching the educational environment through the arts.

Artwork is shown in the three galleries on the Carson Campus, The Bristlecone Gallery, The Atrium Gallery, the College Gallery, and the Virgil Getto Gallery on the Fallon Campus.  

You can view our past exhibits here.

If you are an artist or group of artists interested in showing your work in the WNC  Galleries, proposals are open from September to December to be considered for the following year.  The proposals submitted through this system are viewed by the Art on Campus Advisory Council for recommendations to staff. They are evaluated by quality of work and the work’s ability to create an enriching experience.

You can download the Printable RFP Guidelines.that includes the requirements needed to submit a proposal. Once you are ready to submit, use the button below. 

We welcome your ideas and we will work closely with you to make this collaboration successful. We are open to assisting you in the process. Please email us at artgallery@wnc.edu for a time for a consult. Emailed submissions will not be considered. 

WNC does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, age, gender identity or expression, sexual-orientation, protected veteran status, genetics, or religion in its programs and activities and provides equal access to facilities to all. Inquiries concerning the application of non-discrimination policies may be referred to: Title IX Coordinator: (775) 445-3219 and Director of Human Resources: (775) 445-4235, Western Nevada College.

Proposal Submission Portal

As you prepare your proposal, please see the following RUBRIC that will be used to evaluate it. Each section is weighted based on the needs of WNC’s mission in the use of its gallery space. The questions allow you to construct your proposal to ensure that you address the questions that will be addressed.

Rubric for Evaluation

Criteria Description Weighted Points
Concept & Artistic Merit Strength, originality, clarity, and relevance of the exhibition concept. Demonstrates artistic vision, intellectual depth, and potential audience appeal. 30

Artist Experience & Potential

Artist's exhibition history, professional accomplishments, technical proficiency, and/or demonstrated potential for growth and artistic development. Emerging artists may be evaluated on promise rather than resume alone.

 20

Representation of Underserved Voices or Subject Matter

Exhibition elevates underrepresented artists, communities, perspectives, histories, cultures, or issues that are not typically visible in mainstream gallery programming.

 20

Community Engagement Opportunities 

Potential for artist talks, workshops, lectures, demonstrations, student engagement, partnerships, participatory activities, or other meaningful audience interaction.

 15

Feasibility & Professionalism

Proposal is complete, well organized, realistic, and appropriate for the gallery's space, timeline, and resources. Installation requirements are clearly articulated.

 10

Alignment with Gallery Mission

Supports the gallery's educational, cultural, and community goals. Contributes to a balanced and diverse exhibition program.

 5
Total   100

SCORING GUIDELINES, Based on 10 Scale

  • 9-10: Exceptional
  • 3-4: Limited
  •  7-8: Strong
  • 1-2: Weak
  • 5-6: Adequate
  • 0: Does not address criterion

 Reviewer Questions

  • Is the exhibition idea compelling and clearly articulated?
  • Does the work demonstrate originality and artistic excellence?
  • Will the exhibition engage and educate audiences?

  • Does the artist demonstrate a strong body of work?
  • Is there evidence of artistic growth and commitment?
  • For emerging artists, does the proposal show exceptional promise?

  • Does the proposal broaden representation within the exhibition program?
  • Does it introduce perspectives, histories, or narratives that are often overlooked?
  • Will it help attract new audiences?

  • Are meaningful public programs proposed?
  • Are there opportunities for student, faculty, or community participation?
  • Could partnerships enhance the exhibition's impact?

  • Is the exhibition realistic within available resources?
  • Are installation needs clearly described?
  • Has the artist demonstrated preparedness and professionalism?

  • Does the proposal support the gallery's educational and community objectives?
  • Does it contribute to a diverse and balanced exhibition schedule?